Class of 2022

[LJay]

Must. Post. Tweets.

[LJay]

[cujaysfan]

is that Harold 'The Show' Arceanux's kid?

that guy was a scoring machine at weber state back in the day - lit up UNC in the tourney one year IIRC.

[vivid_dude]

Terrance Arceneaux
Averaged 4 blocks and 2.5 steals per game as a 6'7" SG/SF.
58% FG shooter.
41% from three.

His team won the state championship. He hit a buzzer-beating three-pointer to send the championship game to overtime. Then, at the end of overtime, he hit another buzzer-beating three pointer to win the game. Dude loves beating buzzers. He had 9 blocks in that same game.

My only criticism of him is he hasn't signed with Creighton yet. Selfish on his part.

[bluenrg]

2022 five-star prospect Zion Cruz. Creighton offered.

https://insidetheloudhouse.com/2021/05/ ... ne-visits/

[LJay]

[LJay]

[Trifecta]

Mitch part 2? I like it

[Realhoops]

Mitch part 2? I like it

We already have Mitch part 2 coming in next year, imo. So maybe Mitch part 3 . . .

[vivid_dude]

I'm going to re-quote myself from another thread in a new thread and not apologize for it. Curious what people think about this line of thinking.

While I was hopeful for Watts, and hate Roger Clemens now, my silver lining is that Creighton is in play for so many talented 2022 guards/wings. If we load up too much on freshmen/young transfers this year, does that hurt our chances for potentially more talented players next recruiting cycle? Maybe that's not the way to think, but too late. I'm thinking that way. I feel like the combination of Nembhard, Shereef, Rati, AOC, Antwann, Christofilis can be more-than-serviceable when combined with our also-versatile big guys on the front court.

If I had control of everything, I'd prefer a grad-transfer back-up center with one year of eligibility to play 12 minutes a game and cause havoc. Let the Millers, Hawkins, Kalumas, Kalkbrenners do their thing alongside our backcourt, and instruct this new fella to just hurt folks. If that doesn't happen and we get Trey Alexander, I won't complain.

I have no idea if this is wise, short-sighted, genius, dumb or just not how things work. Do programs/coaches not look at recruiting this way? Is it "get all the best players immediately if they are willing to come" and be thrilled, or do you look at the roster make-up and perhaps make some decisions that give you a better chance at other (more talented?) players in a later recruiting class? I'd love to get Trey Alexander, but with all of the outstanding wings/guards in 2022 that CU has offered, does his signing (if it happens) drastically hurt our chances at what could be more talented, albeit uncertain, prospects down the road? Attrition could be the big variable here that sways things in favor of "sign who you can sign if they are good and figure out '22 in '22." I know the blue bloods just load up and maybe that's how we need to always think.

It's a great "problem" to have.