2019 6’8 F Tristan Enaruna (KU transfer, Iowa State commit)

Keep updated on possible future Bluejays.

Return to Recruiting

Re: 2019 6’8 F Tristan Enaruna

Postby bluejayfan00 » Thu Feb 21, 2019 5:34 pm

JayPak wrote:
Realhoops wrote:Maybe I'm drawing an unfair blank -- but I can't recall a situation where somebody was a starter as a sophomore and/or junior (consistently) and then asked to take a back seat as a senior.

Kenny Lawson. And both he and Mac handled their part of that situation well. (In exchange for Kenny coming off the bench, I suspect Mac offered him all the open 3’s he wanted to take on the perimeter.)

Thought of this as well, but it's a little different. Mac didn't have any allegiance to Kenny, it was his first year. And, no way you were bringing Gregory off the bench
bluejayfan00
 
Posts: 5401
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 12:52 pm

 

Re: 2019 6’8 F Tristan Enaruna

Postby gtmoBlue » Thu Feb 21, 2019 5:52 pm

Sure you could have brought Greory off the bench...It was already 2nd semester. AND
Kenny was the Pre-season pick for POY and had a very good non-conference session that year.
Thought then and still think that was a big 1st year error on Mac's part...broke up good team chemistry they had going.

As for next year Mintz and Ballock can come off the bench to share some of those many minutes. Play your best players and allow the competition in practices
to determine who starts.

Will there be a surprise signee for 2019...another Big after Enaruna? I'm hoping for a defensive C/PF to sit both Epperson and Froling on the deep end of the bench.
Huss has been a busy man and I'm hoping he pulls off a minor miracle.
"This is our time. This is our great opportunity... Standing strong - for a great, great future." - Fr Timothy Lannon, SJ
“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.” - Nicholas Klein (1918)
User avatar
gtmoBlue
 
Posts: 4353
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 11:43 am
Location: Canal Zone, Panama

Re: 2019 6’8 F Tristan Enaruna

Postby #RollJays » Thu Feb 21, 2019 8:33 pm

Froling, Bishop, Epperson and Krampelj is a hell of a logjam at the 5. Ideally need Krampelj and Bishop to be able to play at the 4 quite a bit. Landing Enaruna is going to put an even bigger minutes crunch on us.
#RollJays
 
Posts: 1075
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2017 9:16 pm

Re: 2019 6’8 F Tristan Enaruna

Postby Eye of the Jay » Thu Feb 21, 2019 9:44 pm

I’ll take that minutes crunch in a heartbeat. Enaruna would definitely get playing time at the 4 and then you can slide Ballock and DJ back to the 3 and have actual length on defense. Four guard lineup is fun as long as you’re running and draining 3s but I’d take length across the board any day.
User avatar
Eye of the Jay
 
Posts: 4222
Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2014 7:50 am

Re: 2019 6’8 F Tristan Enaruna

Postby #RollJays » Fri Feb 22, 2019 7:20 am

Eye of the Jay wrote:I’ll take that minutes crunch in a heartbeat. Enaruna would definitely get playing time at the 4 and then you can slide Ballock and DJ back to the 3 and have actual length on defense. Four guard lineup is fun as long as you’re running and draining 3s but I’d take length across the board any day.

Oh for sure we’d take that. It will almost undoubtedly end in a transfer or two but that’s a good problem to have.
#RollJays
 
Posts: 1075
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2017 9:16 pm

Re: 2019 6’8 F Tristan Enaruna

Postby mredle » Fri Feb 22, 2019 10:14 pm

I think Christian Bishop May need Tommy John surgery after all of the work MAC puts him through to develop his Jump shot. Then Christian can start playing a more natural position. More importantly some of the nit wits here can cut the crap that Mac’s plan is to play him at the 5 for his career. The kid didn’t want to redshirt and he has talent. Leave it to Mac to find a way to honor the kids decision and still contribute to the team in a significant way.
mredle
 
Posts: 1625
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2012 4:06 pm

Re: 2019 6’8 F Tristan Enaruna

Postby Jet915 » Sat Feb 23, 2019 10:36 am

Image
Jet915
 
Posts: 7451
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 4:11 pm

Re: 2019 6’8 F Tristan Enaruna

Postby JacobPadilla » Sun Feb 24, 2019 4:13 am

The pitch is that they don't have anyone like him on the roster right now; the 4-guard thing is out of necessity precisely for that reason.

As for the current non-guard options, Martin could get by at the 4 and does so in brief stretches, but with his ability to shoot and attack from the perimeter (he's a pretty good slasher for a big man), he's more of a mismatch at the five and his skill set opens up the offense more there, not to mention he's a great lob threat. Perhaps with a healthy offseason they could spend more time working on two-big lineups with Martin at the 4; he spent the whole offseason and preseason rehabbing this year.

As for Bishop, if he wants to play at the four he needs to spend a lot of time in the gym this offseason. He can't shoot or dribble, which is kind of important in Creighton's offense where everyone handles the ball.

Creighton runs a lot of spread pick-and-roll with one in and four out. Add someone who isn't a threat to dribble and shoot in place of one of the four perimeter players and and you're dramatically impacting the spacing and making things tougher for your playmakers. So you're either using a less effective version of your offense and you're changing what you're doing entirely.

That's where Enaruna comes in; theoretically, someone with his skill set and size would allow Creighton to play like it wants to offensively while also matching up better defensively and on the glass. Is he actually good enough to earn that role right away were he to choose Creighton? Perhaps we'll see, or maybe we'll never know.

Say he does choose Creighton and does earn a starting role right away. That certainly puts something of a roster crunch in place with all the guys that have been pressed into heavy minutes to this point, but that's not the worst thing in the world if everyone is on the same page.

I think most can agree Zegarowski and Alexander are going to start. I wouldn't be shocked at all if Ballock would be OK with coming off the bench if he still played a starter's role. That would leave Mintz (still the team's best perimeter defender) out there to start with Enaruna and Krampelj at the 4 and 5. Sub Ballock for Mintz early, then rotate each of Zegarowski, Alexander, Ballock and Mintz through for 25-30+ minutes each.

Krampelj plays starters' minutes, then Enaruna, Jefferson, Mahoney battle it out for the remaining 3 minutes and the 4 minutes while Epperson, Froling and Bishop sort out the back-up 5 minutes. Maybe Jefferson gets back to what he was doing during the nonconference, or maybe he gets passed up. Maybe Mahoney lives up to the hype, or maybe he takes some time to adjust to the Big East level of play. Both are much less proven than any of the guards.

If Enaruna chooses Kansas or someone else, then Creighton rolls on with the 4-guard lineups and you need more from Jefferson and Mahoney right away. Perhaps they work more with Krampelj at the 4 and open up more minutes at the 5 for the back-up trio. That's something they'll have to play around with this offseason.
JacobPadilla
 
Posts: 2401
Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2013 11:41 am

Re: 2019 6’8 F Tristan Enaruna

Postby Jet915 » Sun Feb 24, 2019 9:28 am

JacobPadilla wrote:The pitch is that they don't have anyone like him on the roster right now; the 4-guard thing is out of necessity precisely for that reason.

As for the current non-guard options, Martin could get by at the 4 and does so in brief stretches, but with his ability to shoot and attack from the perimeter (he's a pretty good slasher for a big man), he's more of a mismatch at the five and his skill set opens up the offense more there, not to mention he's a great lob threat. Perhaps with a healthy offseason they could spend more time working on two-big lineups with Martin at the 4; he spent the whole offseason and preseason rehabbing this year.

As for Bishop, if he wants to play at the four he needs to spend a lot of time in the gym this offseason. He can't shoot or dribble, which is kind of important in Creighton's offense where everyone handles the ball.

Creighton runs a lot of spread pick-and-roll with one in and four out. Add someone who isn't a threat to dribble and shoot in place of one of the four perimeter players and and you're dramatically impacting the spacing and making things tougher for your playmakers. So you're either using a less effective version of your offense and you're changing what you're doing entirely.

That's where Enaruna comes in; theoretically, someone with his skill set and size would allow Creighton to play like it wants to offensively while also matching up better defensively and on the glass. Is he actually good enough to earn that role right away were he to choose Creighton? Perhaps we'll see, or maybe we'll never know.

Say he does choose Creighton and does earn a starting role right away. That certainly puts something of a roster crunch in place with all the guys that have been pressed into heavy minutes to this point, but that's not the worst thing in the world if everyone is on the same page.

I think most can agree Zegarowski and Alexander are going to start. I wouldn't be shocked at all if Ballock would be OK with coming off the bench if he still played a starter's role. That would leave Mintz (still the team's best perimeter defender) out there to start with Enaruna and Krampelj at the 4 and 5. Sub Ballock for Mintz early, then rotate each of Zegarowski, Alexander, Ballock and Mintz through for 25-30+ minutes each.

Krampelj plays starters' minutes, then Enaruna, Jefferson, Mahoney battle it out for the remaining 3 minutes and the 4 minutes while Epperson, Froling and Bishop sort out the back-up 5 minutes. Maybe Jefferson gets back to what he was doing during the nonconference, or maybe he gets passed up. Maybe Mahoney lives up to the hype, or maybe he takes some time to adjust to the Big East level of play. Both are much less proven than any of the guards.

If Enaruna chooses Kansas or someone else, then Creighton rolls on with the 4-guard lineups and you need more from Jefferson and Mahoney right away. Perhaps they work more with Krampelj at the 4 and open up more minutes at the 5 for the back-up trio. That's something they'll have to play around with this offseason.


Jacob, some peeps are saying Mahoney is one of the better players on the team, I would think he would get big minutes...
Image
Jet915
 
Posts: 7451
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 4:11 pm

Re: 2019 6’8 F Tristan Enaruna

Postby bleedblue » Sun Feb 24, 2019 10:55 am

Everything I'd heard before the season was that Mahoney would be starting this seasom if eligible.

I'd guess next season we'll have a starting line up of Zegs, Tyshon, Mahoney, Martin and Epperson.

Next 5 up would be Reef, Davion, Mitch, Bishop and Froling.

Jefferson might be the odd man out next year and everything could change with another signee or transfer.
bleedblue
 
Posts: 360
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2014 4:36 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Recruiting

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 18 guests