Fri Sep 17, 2021 5:45 pm
Jays fan wrote:LJay wrote:Ah ha, I think you’re right. That leaves options and, with inevitable transfers, who knows where things will be in 12 months.
One last thought. Shereef Mitchel is starting his junior year ( Creighton website lists him as a sophomore). In 2022 he will be a senior. In 2023 he can play his extra “covid” year. That would make another scholarship available because your extra year does not count against the scholarship limit?
Fri Sep 17, 2021 7:35 pm
JacobPadilla wrote:Jays fan wrote:LJay wrote:Ah ha, I think you’re right. That leaves options and, with inevitable transfers, who knows where things will be in 12 months.
One last thought. Shereef Mitchel is starting his junior year ( Creighton website lists him as a sophomore). In 2022 he will be a senior. In 2023 he can play his extra “covid” year. That would make another scholarship available because your extra year does not count against the scholarship limit?
I'm not positive on this, but I don't think super seniors will be free every year like they were this year. The reasoning for that rule is coaches would have had to make tough decisions since they already had a lot of their 2021 recruits locked in and would have had to drop recruits or told seniors they couldn't come back. Coaches will have had more time to sort out their roster management situation starting next year and moving forward.
Fri Sep 17, 2021 8:52 pm
Realhoops wrote:JacobPadilla wrote:Jays fan wrote:
One last thought. Shereef Mitchel is starting his junior year ( Creighton website lists him as a sophomore). In 2022 he will be a senior. In 2023 he can play his extra “covid” year. That would make another scholarship available because your extra year does not count against the scholarship limit?
I'm not positive on this, but I don't think super seniors will be free every year like they were this year. The reasoning for that rule is coaches would have had to make tough decisions since they already had a lot of their 2021 recruits locked in and would have had to drop recruits or told seniors they couldn't come back. Coaches will have had more time to sort out their roster management situation starting next year and moving forward.
I thought the basic idea was that that year simply didn't count at all -- so people who did play but didn't get more than a handful of games, etc., didn't have to apply and be evaluated for some kind of waiver, etc. I thought they basically just wiped the slate clean for every player for that year. Is that not what they did?
Fri Sep 17, 2021 9:28 pm
Fri Sep 17, 2021 10:19 pm
Mon Sep 20, 2021 12:00 pm
Mon Sep 27, 2021 12:24 pm