So Rothstein posted months ago we were getting Iowa in LV. Just went back to my post with a tweet copy and the tweet has been deleted.
I wonder which parties were involved In reconfiguring that tournament?
Eye of the Jay wrote:Average (mean) NET ranking this year: 146
Average (mean) NET ranking last year: 116
That is also not taking into consideration the high likelihood that Michigan and Texas Tech will regress from their Top 10 rankings. The extra 300+ NET teams will slightly hurt, but as we saw w/ NC St. and Ohio St. last year blowing bad teams out at home can also help/not hurt NET.
This year:
8 home games 2 away games 2 neutral games
Last year:
7 home games 2 away games 3 neutral games
That being said, our non-con SOS last year was 36 with an overall SOS of 28 with a down (relatively) Big East. We also went 8-4 last year against that difficult schedule, so I'd say 9-3 with this schedule would be on par, and 10-2 with some convincing wins would give us a better resume going into conference play than last year.
Eye of the Jay wrote:Adding NAIA Midlands doesn’t really do anything for us. Would rather have a 200ish Div 1 school. Gotta go 9-3 and 11-7 or 10-2 and 10-8 in conference and non-con which isn’t gonna be an easy task.
And yes I know 20 wins is by far an outdated item, but I’d rather not have to sweat the bubble and choke giving up offensive rebounds to X with our tourney lives on the line this year. Easy Div 1 wins that separate us from that .500 number would help. Not saying saturate the schedule with them but an additional one to this years schedule woulda been nice.
Point is moot next year as our 22-game Big East schedule should cancel this out if we go to 11-game non-con.
mannygakou wrote:Eye of the Jay wrote:Adding NAIA Midlands doesn’t really do anything for us. Would rather have a 200ish Div 1 school. Gotta go 9-3 and 11-7 or 10-2 and 10-8 in conference and non-con which isn’t gonna be an easy task.
And yes I know 20 wins is by far an outdated item, but I’d rather not have to sweat the bubble and choke giving up offensive rebounds to X with our tourney lives on the line this year. Easy Div 1 wins that separate us from that .500 number would help. Not saying saturate the schedule with them but an additional one to this years schedule woulda been nice.
Point is moot next year as our 22-game Big East schedule should cancel this out if we go to 11-game non-con.
Let's take a guess at which Big East schools the Jays playing thrice next year
JayPharmAlum wrote:mannygakou wrote:Eye of the Jay wrote:Adding NAIA Midlands doesn’t really do anything for us. Would rather have a 200ish Div 1 school. Gotta go 9-3 and 11-7 or 10-2 and 10-8 in conference and non-con which isn’t gonna be an easy task.
And yes I know 20 wins is by far an outdated item, but I’d rather not have to sweat the bubble and choke giving up offensive rebounds to X with our tourney lives on the line this year. Easy Div 1 wins that separate us from that .500 number would help. Not saying saturate the schedule with them but an additional one to this years schedule woulda been nice.
Point is moot next year as our 22-game Big East schedule should cancel this out if we go to 11-game non-con.
Let's take a guess at which Big East schools the Jays playing thrice next year
Why would we play a 22 game conference schedule? If we play the other ten teams each twice, that’s 20 games.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests