vivid_dude wrote:ictjay wrote:How a basketball fan justifies and puts credence by following "predictor" websites that have as much accuracy as a Ouija board is baffling.
Whatever floats you're boat.
Read more post less.
It's information. That's all it is. The recruiting sites are made up of writers and "predictors" who tend to have more access to information. They do this shit for a living. I don't think anyone "relies" on the predictions, but rather enjoy seeing what the popular thinking is among such writers. Again, it's just information.
I respectfully disagree. It's not information. It's opinion. To the extent that they as individuals follow comments made by recruits they may have more information available to them. That doesn't mean that their opinion is any more accurate than anyone elses. First and foremost they are in the entertainment business. Their predictions are more like reading tea leaves than predicting the weather. There is a reason 247 is scoffed at by contributors to sites like this. I have a rule I like to call "Allison's Rule of Media Accuracy." It holds that "the accuracy of any media story is inversely proportional to your involvement in it." The predictions made on recruiting sites have less accuracy than a stock tip you might get from your broker. Your broker has access to a lot of information but they cannot time the market nor are they particularly prescient when it comes to specific stocks. Did you know that the best people on Wall Street tend to be promoted to mutual funds manager? Did you know that the vast majority of mutual funds managers don't invest in mutual funds? If they invest in the markets they tend to invest in index funds which tend to imitate individual markets (S&P, NYSE, etc) as a whole. As we have all seen, trying to read the minds of 17 and 18 year olds is neither reliable nor profitable.