.BenningtonBluejay wrote:Seen some Jays on the 4 line, would be disappointing
Kolder Fan wrote:I guess since we have some time (unfortunately) - let's take a look at the competition. I don't dive too deep but this is how I see it:
- Creighton - 8-5 Q1 and 7-4 Q2 with a NC SOS of 54
- Kentucky - 6-5 Q1 and 2-2 Q2 with a Q3 Loss and a NC SOS of 164
- Illinois - 5-6 Q1 and 6-1 Q2 with a Q3 Loss and NC SOS of 145
- Alabama - 3-8 Q1 and 8-2 Q2 and a NC SOS of 18
- Iowa State - 8-6 Q1 and 6-1 Q2 with a NC SOS 326
I didn't go into the metrics too far obviously but these have to be a the top end of things the committee looks at? We compare very favorably to all of these. I guess I see us as a 3 but could be completely off base. Would love to get thoughts from those that take a deeper look to let me know if I am missing something. Also - in regards to Alabama - does the committee look at head to head?
Jaybird wrote:The first round matchup I'd most like to see: nebby vs Texas A&M. At halftime, Alberts could dramatically walk across the court from the cornflake side to TAMU, sort of like when the President crosses the field at half of the Army-Navy game, as both fanbases warmly applaud. I'm sure the same would happen with ole' Trev.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests