UConn Game Thread II

Talk about YOUR Creighton Bluejays!

Return to Men's Hoops

Re: UConn Game Thread II

Postby brianjay1317 » Wed Feb 12, 2025 7:42 pm

Alphawalt wrote:
brianjay1317 wrote:
SonofFrankTomera wrote:
I like Hurley as well. If you get the chance, check out the interview he did on the Graham Bensinger show, it’s well worth a listen.

i love to hate him (and i don't think he's a bad person even though i wouldn't want my coach acting like him). he's definitely good for the conference.


In the post game news Q and A, Hurley said he will be glad to see Kalkbrenner leave as he is super tough to plan/play against and didn’t know why he was not playing pro yet, and will vote for him to be BE POY. He also said he had a lot of respect for Ash and thought he was first team BE also. He also complimented the home court advantage and was glad he finally got a win in Omaha. Off the court, he is a gracious man, but is just a little over the top during game action.

yeah, i think he is a decent person and i even respect him. but he draws too much attention to himself and i think that would get annoying as a fan. but he's perfect for uconn, lol.
brianjay1317
 
Posts: 75
Joined: Fri Mar 08, 2024 5:43 pm

 

Re: UConn Game Thread II

Postby Angry Dan » Wed Feb 12, 2025 9:34 pm

I enjoyed Hurley and McNeely’s post game presser. Both of those guys are hilarious. Must See YouTube TV
Angry Dan
 
Posts: 950
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2017 3:40 pm

Re: UConn Game Thread II

Postby drbluejay » Thu Feb 13, 2025 8:16 am

Am I the only one that didn't have a problem with missing 2 FT's on purpose? I get tired of seeing teams make the FT, foul and the other team makes both FT's to seal the game. I wonder what people would say if we rebounded the miss, tipped it out to Ash and bingo, nothing but net to win the game. Just because the 2 misses didn't work doesn't mean it was the wrong choice. It always looks dumb when it doesn't work.
drbluejay
 
Posts: 1789
Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2015 9:19 am

Re: UConn Game Thread II

Postby cu8493 » Thu Feb 13, 2025 9:55 am

My two cents: (and conceding Mac is a hell of a lot better at the coaching thing then I ever was) They were not yet in the double bonus. If you miss on purpose, either we get the rebound still down 3 or they get the rebound and we have to foul down three - which is what happened of course. If you make the 2nd free throw, two good things could happen - turnover on the inbounds pass down two (how often have we seen that go against us) or you foul immediately if you don't get a TO on the inbound and they miss the front of the one and one (in which case we are down 2) or they miss the 2nd (in which case it is still a one possession game). If Neal makes the 2nd and we are down 2, they don't foul Green on the rebound of the missed free throw or we are shooting two at the other end. So, we'd have 6 seconds to get up court and get off a shot when they are going to make sure they don't foul -advantage offense.

When the other team is not yet in double bonus, and without doing any kind of statistical research, I think the chance of getting the rebound on an intentional miss is lower than the chances of one of the good things happening after a make (either TO on the inbounds pass or the other team missing the first free throw (as they did)). If Jamaya makes the 2nd free throw, we are down 2 with 6 seconds. If we don't get a TO on the inbounds and foul immediately, there is still plenty of time to get up court and a decent shot to tie or win after the missed free throw. I get it if he made both at the time its likely game over. But, we effectively gave them two chance to get up four by intentionally missing Neal's 2nd free throw. I didn't like having Neal miss the 2nd intentionally with 6 seconds to go.

Even with about four seconds left, if Jason hits the 2nd free throw, its a one point game. Four seconds is enough time to get a shot off from inside half court even if we didn't get a TO on the inbound and UConn made both free throws. And if they missed a FT there also, we'd be down 1 or 2 with a chance of a shot to tie or win (not high probability, but I think a greater chance than we had of getting the intentional miss). My thought is only under about 2-3 seconds on the game clock do you go for what I think is a much lower likelihood of success play of intentionally missing the free throw. I give Mac that with four seconds, its a lot closer call, but I still think enough time that we'd have a better chance of a positive outcome if we'd made the 2nd free throw there.
cu8493
 
Posts: 2383
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 6:03 pm

Re: UConn Game Thread II

Postby Here'sToMe » Thu Feb 13, 2025 10:24 am

All this assumes that Neal, who feels like a 37% free throw shooter no matter what the numbers say, actually makes the second one after he had already missed the first.
Here'sToMe
 
Posts: 393
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 4:43 am

Re: UConn Game Thread II

Postby JacobPadilla » Thu Feb 13, 2025 11:52 pm

#RollJays wrote:Was Hurrdat at the game to cover Creighton or Hurley last night? lol


My gamer: https://hurrdatsports.com/creighton-men ... -to-uconn/

Ana's interview with Jasen: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5pWZG1CxgmA

Brandon's photo gallery: https://hurrdatsports.com/creighton/pho ... 2-11-2025/

Plenty of Creighton coverage during and after. Just having a little fun a guy who has a unique relationship with the CHI. Not sure if anybody else got it too, but Brandon caught the "Two rings, baldy" comment, which was objectively hilarious considering the source.
JacobPadilla
 
Posts: 2401
Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2013 11:41 am

Re: UConn Game Thread II

Postby Realhoops » Sun Feb 16, 2025 6:41 am

Another loss where we let one get away that we should have won and then it becomes worse later. UConn being unable to beat Seton Hall in Camden makes that loss sting even more.
_________________
Do I contradict myself?
Very well then ... I contradict myself.
I am large ... I contain multitudes.
--Walt Whitman
User avatar
Realhoops
 
Posts: 4916
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 4:10 am
Location: In your head.

Re: UConn Game Thread II

Postby TrueBlueJay » Sun Feb 16, 2025 7:49 am

Realhoops wrote:Another loss where we let one get away that we should have won and then it becomes worse later. UConn being unable to beat Seton Hall in Camden makes that loss sting even more.


A ray of sunshine for this cold winter day.

Didn’t sting me one bit. Loved it!
User avatar
TrueBlueJay
 
Posts: 2934
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 4:26 am
Location: Mr. Rogers' Neighborhood

Re: UConn Game Thread II

Postby Realhoops » Sun Feb 16, 2025 8:29 am

TrueBlueJay wrote:
Realhoops wrote:Another loss where we let one get away that we should have won and then it becomes worse later. UConn being unable to beat Seton Hall in Camden makes that loss sting even more.


A ray of sunshine for this cold winter day.

Didn’t sting me one bit. Loved it!


Arguably the worst team in the conference was able to beat them. That’s how beatable UConn is. What stings is that we couldn’t figure out a way to slow down one single guy who managed to beat us all by himself. It stings that we missed on another big opportunity. It doesn’t sting seeing them struggle — but we should not have blown yet another very winnable home game. That does.
_________________
Do I contradict myself?
Very well then ... I contradict myself.
I am large ... I contain multitudes.
--Walt Whitman
User avatar
Realhoops
 
Posts: 4916
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 4:10 am
Location: In your head.

Re: UConn Game Thread II

Postby Altmanforprez » Sun Feb 16, 2025 10:41 am

Not even arguably, they were a full 100 spots lower than DePaul in the NET rankings until yesterday. It's the 2nd worst loss for a defending national champ in the KenPom era (since 2002)
Altmanforprez
 
Posts: 390
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2020 3:14 pm

Previous

Return to Men's Hoops

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests