Re: TRANSFER :: Clayton Custer
Posted: Sat Apr 18, 2015 1:06 pmbig get for them. Creighton priorities are elsewhere right now.
The Bluejay Underground: A Creighton Sports Message Board
at White & Blue Review
http://www.bluejayunderground.com/
TRANSFER :: Clayton Custer (Loyola-Chicago Verbal)
Page 5 of 6
Posted: Sat Apr 18, 2015 1:06 pmRe: TRANSFER :: Clayton Custer (Loyola-Chicago Verbal)
Posted: Sat Apr 18, 2015 1:08 pmWould have been a good get, but we have bigger needs for 2016-17.
Re: TRANSFER :: Clayton Custer
Posted: Sat Apr 18, 2015 1:56 pmWe went from this -
...to this.
Huh? As an insider - would you please enlighten us a bit.
especially since all the new negative nancys will be saying this is "another miss" by the Jays.
Re: TRANSFER :: Clayton Custer
Postby hilltopalum » Mon Apr 13, 2015 11:09 pm
He'd be a huge addition. He's a creighton type kid, much like Kreklow. We missed on Ricky a number of times, let's hope we don't miss on Clayton.
...to this.
hilltopalum wrote:big get for them. Creighton priorities are elsewhere right now.
Huh? As an insider - would you please enlighten us a bit.
especially since all the new negative nancys will be saying this is "another miss" by the Jays.
Re: TRANSFER :: Clayton Custer (Loyola-Chicago Verbal)
Posted: Sat Apr 18, 2015 2:44 pmNot a big loss IMO.
Re: TRANSFER :: Clayton Custer
Posted: Sat Apr 18, 2015 2:52 pmgtmoBlue wrote:We went from this -Re: TRANSFER :: Clayton Custer
Postby hilltopalum » Mon Apr 13, 2015 11:09 pm
He'd be a huge addition. He's a creighton type kid, much like Kreklow. We missed on Ricky a number of times, let's hope we don't miss on Clayton.
...to this.hilltopalum wrote:big get for them. Creighton priorities are elsewhere right now.
Huh? As an insider - would you please enlighten us a bit.
especially since all the new negative nancys will be saying this is "another miss" by the Jays.
I think Custer is a good player, and would have fit in well here, just others ahead of him right now. Would have likely had to walk-on in year 1.
Re: TRANSFER :: Clayton Custer (Loyola-Chicago Verbal)
Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2015 8:43 amHe should be pretty good for them. He'll be a top PG in the MVC. It would have been nice to have him but Marlon Stewart has plenty of potential and has more of a Big East body it seems like.
Re: TRANSFER :: Clayton Custer
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2018 7:20 pmhilltopalum wrote:big get for them. Creighton priorities are elsewhere right now.
Lol
Re: TRANSFER :: Clayton Custer (Loyola-Chicago Verbal)
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2018 7:58 pmJet915 wrote:Not a big loss IMO.
Agreed! He sucks (as he cuts down the nets).
Re: TRANSFER :: Clayton Custer
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2018 8:03 pmtaa71458 wrote:hilltopalum wrote:big get for them. Creighton priorities are elsewhere right now.
Lol
Still contend he's a Creighton type kid and would have been great here. Would not have gotten reps over Watson, and Jays wanted Mychal Mulder bad. Right or wrong that was the thought.
Re: TRANSFER :: Clayton Custer
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2018 8:42 pmhilltopalum wrote:taa71458 wrote:hilltopalum wrote:big get for them. Creighton priorities are elsewhere right now.
Lol
Still contend he's a Creighton type kid and would have been great here. Would not have gotten reps over Watson, and Jays wanted Mychal Mulder bad. Right or wrong that was the thought.
Definitely not calling you out at all, just calling out all the misses we've had at PG. Kid still has another year of eligibility next year and our PG play outside of Chatman and Mo has been underwhelming.