Sat Apr 18, 2015 1:06 pm
Sat Apr 18, 2015 1:08 pm
Sat Apr 18, 2015 1:56 pm
Re: TRANSFER :: Clayton Custer
Postby hilltopalum » Mon Apr 13, 2015 11:09 pm
He'd be a huge addition. He's a creighton type kid, much like Kreklow. We missed on Ricky a number of times, let's hope we don't miss on Clayton.
hilltopalum wrote:big get for them. Creighton priorities are elsewhere right now.
Sat Apr 18, 2015 2:44 pm
Sat Apr 18, 2015 2:52 pm
gtmoBlue wrote:We went from this -Re: TRANSFER :: Clayton Custer
Postby hilltopalum » Mon Apr 13, 2015 11:09 pm
He'd be a huge addition. He's a creighton type kid, much like Kreklow. We missed on Ricky a number of times, let's hope we don't miss on Clayton.
...to this.hilltopalum wrote:big get for them. Creighton priorities are elsewhere right now.
Huh? As an insider - would you please enlighten us a bit.
especially since all the new negative nancys will be saying this is "another miss" by the Jays.
Mon Apr 20, 2015 8:43 am
Sat Mar 17, 2018 7:20 pm
hilltopalum wrote:big get for them. Creighton priorities are elsewhere right now.
Sat Mar 17, 2018 7:58 pm
Jet915 wrote:Not a big loss IMO.
Sat Mar 17, 2018 8:03 pm
taa71458 wrote:hilltopalum wrote:big get for them. Creighton priorities are elsewhere right now.
Lol
Sat Mar 17, 2018 8:42 pm
hilltopalum wrote:taa71458 wrote:hilltopalum wrote:big get for them. Creighton priorities are elsewhere right now.
Lol
Still contend he's a Creighton type kid and would have been great here. Would not have gotten reps over Watson, and Jays wanted Mychal Mulder bad. Right or wrong that was the thought.