TRANSFER :: Clayton Custer (Loyola-Chicago Verbal)
Re: TRANSFER :: Clayton Custer
by hilltopalum » Sat Apr 18, 2015 1:06 pm
big get for them. Creighton priorities are elsewhere right now.
-
hilltopalum - Posts: 2703
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 3:42 am
Re: TRANSFER :: Clayton Custer (Loyola-Chicago Verbal)
by R Jay » Sat Apr 18, 2015 1:08 pm
Would have been a good get, but we have bigger needs for 2016-17.
“Even though I’m not playing I still don’t want my school to be disrespected, because I play for the name on the front of my chest, not the name on my back. I’m a part of this family now, and when they disrespected them they disrespected me”-Mo Watson Jr.
-
R Jay - Posts: 755
- Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2014 5:57 pm
Re: TRANSFER :: Clayton Custer
by gtmoBlue » Sat Apr 18, 2015 1:56 pm
We went from this -
...to this.
Huh? As an insider - would you please enlighten us a bit.
especially since all the new negative nancys will be saying this is "another miss" by the Jays.
Re: TRANSFER :: Clayton Custer
Postby hilltopalum » Mon Apr 13, 2015 11:09 pm
He'd be a huge addition. He's a creighton type kid, much like Kreklow. We missed on Ricky a number of times, let's hope we don't miss on Clayton.
...to this.
hilltopalum wrote:big get for them. Creighton priorities are elsewhere right now.
Huh? As an insider - would you please enlighten us a bit.
especially since all the new negative nancys will be saying this is "another miss" by the Jays.
"This is our time. This is our great opportunity... Standing strong - for a great, great future." - Fr Timothy Lannon, SJ
“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.” - Nicholas Klein (1918)
“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.” - Nicholas Klein (1918)
-
gtmoBlue - Posts: 4283
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 11:43 am
- Location: Canal Zone, Panama
Re: TRANSFER :: Clayton Custer (Loyola-Chicago Verbal)
by Jet915 » Sat Apr 18, 2015 2:44 pm
Not a big loss IMO.
- Jet915
- Posts: 7416
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 4:11 pm
Re: TRANSFER :: Clayton Custer
by hilltopalum » Sat Apr 18, 2015 2:52 pm
gtmoBlue wrote:We went from this -Re: TRANSFER :: Clayton Custer
Postby hilltopalum » Mon Apr 13, 2015 11:09 pm
He'd be a huge addition. He's a creighton type kid, much like Kreklow. We missed on Ricky a number of times, let's hope we don't miss on Clayton.
...to this.hilltopalum wrote:big get for them. Creighton priorities are elsewhere right now.
Huh? As an insider - would you please enlighten us a bit.
especially since all the new negative nancys will be saying this is "another miss" by the Jays.
I think Custer is a good player, and would have fit in well here, just others ahead of him right now. Would have likely had to walk-on in year 1.
-
hilltopalum - Posts: 2703
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 3:42 am
Re: TRANSFER :: Clayton Custer (Loyola-Chicago Verbal)
by section202jay » Mon Apr 20, 2015 8:43 am
He should be pretty good for them. He'll be a top PG in the MVC. It would have been nice to have him but Marlon Stewart has plenty of potential and has more of a Big East body it seems like.
-
section202jay - Posts: 1978
- Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 12:13 pm
- Location: Bellevue, Neb.
Re: TRANSFER :: Clayton Custer
by taa71458 » Sat Mar 17, 2018 7:20 pm
hilltopalum wrote:big get for them. Creighton priorities are elsewhere right now.
Lol
-
taa71458 - Posts: 5323
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 4:36 am
- Location: The Trademark Office
Re: TRANSFER :: Clayton Custer (Loyola-Chicago Verbal)
by LJay » Sat Mar 17, 2018 7:58 pm
Jet915 wrote:Not a big loss IMO.
Agreed! He sucks (as he cuts down the nets).
89 - 60
-
LJay - Posts: 7060
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 3:49 am
Re: TRANSFER :: Clayton Custer
by hilltopalum » Sat Mar 17, 2018 8:03 pm
taa71458 wrote:hilltopalum wrote:big get for them. Creighton priorities are elsewhere right now.
Lol
Still contend he's a Creighton type kid and would have been great here. Would not have gotten reps over Watson, and Jays wanted Mychal Mulder bad. Right or wrong that was the thought.
-
hilltopalum - Posts: 2703
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 3:42 am
Re: TRANSFER :: Clayton Custer
by taa71458 » Sat Mar 17, 2018 8:42 pm
hilltopalum wrote:taa71458 wrote:hilltopalum wrote:big get for them. Creighton priorities are elsewhere right now.
Lol
Still contend he's a Creighton type kid and would have been great here. Would not have gotten reps over Watson, and Jays wanted Mychal Mulder bad. Right or wrong that was the thought.
Definitely not calling you out at all, just calling out all the misses we've had at PG. Kid still has another year of eligibility next year and our PG play outside of Chatman and Mo has been underwhelming.
-
taa71458 - Posts: 5323
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 4:36 am
- Location: The Trademark Office
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests