Thu Sep 25, 2014 12:55 pm
jayball wrote:
What reason do you have to question the coaches on the recruiting front?
They aren't working hard enough......bullcrap.
They aren't getting ranked players....wrong, but people need to realize that not every good player is gonna be top 50 or top 100. There are 5 players on the court at time and 1 ball.
We can't compete with the Big East....how the f do you know that? We competed pretty damn well with an MVC roster.
Most of the posters on here know jackshit about anything. We read internet articles done mostly by fanboys and watch highlight videos with zero understanding of the level of competition begin faced. I enjoy following recruiting, but you are gonna be on miserable SOB if you are gonna hyperanlayze every bit of it from what you read on the web. I think it's unfair to start calling out staff when the class isn't finished yet.
We are gonna have 50 nos to every yes.
deal with it.
Thu Sep 25, 2014 1:10 pm
taa71458 wrote:I guess I missed the board rule where no one is allowed to be critical
Thu Sep 25, 2014 1:11 pm
jayball wrote:taa71458 wrote:I guess I missed the board rule where no one is allowed to be critical
Critical because an 17 year old chooses to at basketball at Michigan state near his grandparents?
Really?
How about some perspective?
Thu Sep 25, 2014 1:15 pm
jayball wrote:taa71458 wrote:I guess I missed the board rule where no one is allowed to be critical
Critical because an 17 year old chooses to at basketball at Michigan state near his grandparents?
Really?
How about some perspective?
Thu Sep 25, 2014 1:18 pm
Thu Sep 25, 2014 1:29 pm
R to the OB wrote:Does everyone here know why we won in The Valley? Talent. We had more talent (and we used it well, too, but that's another issue entirely) than Bradley, Drake, Wichita, Illinois St., etc. That's why I am concerned. We need top level talent to compete. That's why Georgetown, Marquette, and Villanova are successful year in and year out. The staff needs to identify and bring in that talent to continue to win. Plain and simple.
If our staff can't do it and we can't win, well, they have to be held accountable. And no, I'm not saying that Mac and company needs to be fired on the spot or at the end of the year if we end up under-performing, so don't get all defensive.
Despite my comments I am still optimistic about where this program is going, but I also realize that a winning program requires players who are able to win.
Thu Sep 25, 2014 1:31 pm
R to the OB wrote:Does everyone here know why we won in The Valley? Talent. ..., but I also realize that a winning program requires players who are able to win.
Thu Sep 25, 2014 1:34 pm
Thu Sep 25, 2014 1:39 pm
R to the OB wrote:Does everyone here know why we won in The Valley? Talent. We had more talent (and we used it well, too, but that's another issue entirely) than Bradley, Drake, Wichita, Illinois St., etc. That's why I am concerned. We need top level talent to compete. That's why Georgetown, Marquette, and Villanova are successful year in and year out. The staff needs to identify and bring in that talent to continue to win. Plain and simple.
Thu Sep 25, 2014 1:54 pm
CURx wrote:I guess I don't understand the infatuation with recruit rankings...