not really sure there is a precedence for the Mintz situation. Did Zierden take a bench role? Hegner? Dingman? We recruited over all three of those players. I remember thinking really successful teams have solid experienced players coming off the bench. The good coaches can convince those players to own that role and stay within the program.
- MZ is better PG. He starts
- TSA is a better SG. He starts
- If the question is between Ballock (Jr) v. Mintz (Sr) I cant see the staff just giving Mintz the over a guy like Ballock because he's a "senior"
Ballock is tied for mpg on the roster with TSA. Not sure either take a step back in terms of mpg. I guess real question is if we are going to stick with the 4 guard lineup. I think one of the reasons Ballock has struggled is because he's commonly asked to play the "4" which is not a big deal in our offense, but has caused him problems on defense. I'd much rather have a guy like MK, Mahoney or Enaruna at the 4. No way they are introducing one of those three to the position to lessen the mpg that Ballock is getting. I think it would come at Mintz expense.